Peterson, Johnson & Murray – Chicago LLC
Chicago Attorneys
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Firm Profile
    • Our Clients
    • Close
  • Attorneys
    • Attorneys
    • Paul A. O’Grady
    • Dominick L. Lanzito
    • Kevin M. Casey
    • Ajay Shah
    • Deanna Rosenbaum Hall
    • Jennifer Turiello
    • Joselyn R. Mathews
    • Patrick G. Connelly
    • Shantel I. Perez
    • Thomas J. Condon, Jr.
    • Kevin Kearney
    • Thomas Nelligan
    • Close
  • Areas of Practice
    • Areas of Practice
    • Municipal Law
    • Municipal Litigation
    • Civil Rights / ADA / Employment Law
    • Personal Injury & Property Damage
    • Labor & Employment
    • Gaming Law
    • Reinsurance & Regulatory Practice
    • Appellate Representation
    • Insurance Coverage Issues
    • Worker’s Compensation Litigation
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
    • Professional Liability
    • Close
  • Legal Blog
  • Contact Us
August 14, 2019

Illinois Municipal Law: Stormwater Fee Upheld by Illinois Appellate Court

Illinois Applelate Court, Municipal Law

By Joselyn Varghese

In recent years, municipalities have been attempting to combat higher rainfall and stormwater flooding. Many of these municipalities are having to extend and expand their stormwater management systems to account for the added moisture. However, these expansions can be costly and requires municipalities to offset such costs.

The Appellate Court of Illinois, First District recently struck down a resident’s claim that a fee assessed by the Village of Winnetka was actually a tax in relation to a stormwater system expansion project. This decision, by the Appellate Court, further defines home rule public bodies’ authority in assessing fees when it is within the bounds of improving utilities, without being challenged as an unconstitutional attempt to tax residents.

In Green v. the Village of Winnetka, the dispute arose over a 2014 ordinance regarding a stormwater management plan. The Village of Winnetka (Winnetka) had previously experienced severe flooding between 2008 to 2011, which required a possible overhaul of its stormwater system. In doing so, Winnetka would have to finance a majority of the project by issuing bonds, reflected in the fee paid by residents. The ordinance imposed the fee based upon an equivalent runoff unit (ERU) of 3,400 square feet of impervious surface area. Green made a number of arguments on the first and second appeal, most notably he argued that this fee was not proportional to use of the stormwater system because it does not account for the amount of water discharged by each property, but rather was a property tax designed to cover the debt of issued bonds.

The Court ruled in favor of Winnetka’s argument that the fee is paid pursuant to an express or implied contract with a municipality in exchange for services, property, or improvements. Additionally, the fee does not have to reflect the actual value or cost of the services, property, or improvements. The fee is also subject to an adjustment based on a reassessment and change in each property owner’s ERU.

Another Illinois Appellate Court has addressed this issue in a strikingly similar case regarding a fee assessed to property owners for their use of stormwater systems in Rock Island. The Appellate Court held that the fee was not a tax because any revenue collected would be deposited into a stormwater fund to pay for the City’s stormwater utility. Church of Peace v. City of Rock Island, 357 Ill. App. 3d. 471. The Winnetka court followed in line with the 3rd Districts ruling because both ordinances used the ERU to assess the stormwater fees and both defined impervious areas identically. Additionally, property owners who do not use the stormwater system would receive a 100% credit.

Finally, the fact that the stormwater fee revenue is spent on capital improvements and pays for the bonds issued for those improvements does not render it as a tax. The court also noted Illinois Supreme Court precedent that a fee on developed land is not a real property tax merely because it was assessed upon real property and its owners. Since Winnetka was able to establish a constitutionally reasonable relationship between the subject and object of the fee, the Appellate Court found that the fee is constitutional.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me below.  Thank you.

Joselyn Varghese
Phone: 312-724-8039
Email: jvarghese@pjmchicago.com

 

Illinois Municipal Law & the “Leveling the Playing Field for Illinois Retail Act”: We’re in the Money FOIA: Ongoing Murder Investigation Not Enough to Claim Blanket Exemption According to First District Illinois Appellate Court Ruling

Related Posts

Municipal Law

Illinois Municipal Law & the “Leveling the Playing Field for Illinois Retail Act”: We’re in the Money

Illinois Marijuana Law, Municipal Law

Legalization of Marijuana & It’s Impact on Law Enforcement

Illinois Marijuana Law, Municipal Law

How High? Local Government’s Ability to Control & Impact the Marijuana Industry

Search

Categories

  • Firearm Dealer License Certification Act
  • First Admendment
  • FOIA
  • Government Severance Act
  • Gun Trafficking Information Act
  • Illinois Applelate Court
  • Illinois Firearm Concealed Carry Act
  • Illinois Gaming Expansion Law
  • Illinois Marijuana Law
  • Illinois Peer-to-Peer Car Sharing Act
  • Illinois Raffles and Poker Runs Act
  • Illinois Supreme Court
  • Local Government and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act
  • Municipal Law
  • Open Meeting Act (OMA)
  • Prevailing Wage Act
  • Rental Regulations
  • Statue of Limitations
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • FOIA: Ongoing Murder Investigation Not Enough to Claim Blanket Exemption According to First District Illinois Appellate Court Ruling
  • Illinois Municipal Law: Stormwater Fee Upheld by Illinois Appellate Court
  • Illinois Municipal Law & the “Leveling the Playing Field for Illinois Retail Act”: We’re in the Money
  • Gaming Expansion Law: Illinois Bets Big
  • Illinois Cannabis Legislation Impact on the Workplace

Archives

  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
PJM Law

Contact Us

Peterson, Johnson & Murray — Chicago LLC

Address:
200 West Adams St. STE 2125
Chicago, IL 60606

Telephone: 312-782-7150
Fax: 312-896-9318

Attorneys

  • Paul A. O’Grady
  • Dominick L. Lanzito
  • Kevin M. Casey
  • Ajay Shah
  • Deanna Rosenbaum Hall
  • Kevin Kearney
  • Thomas Nelligan
  • Jennifer Turiello
  • Joselyn R. Mathews
  • Patrick G. Connelly
  • Shantel I. Perez
  • Thomas J. Condon, Jr.
Copyright 2018-2021 Peterson, Johnson & Murray — Chicago LLC | Disclaimer